<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook Boots Microsoft Display Ads]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/facebook-boots-microsoft-display-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/facebook-boots-microsoft-display-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/facebook-boots-microsoft-display-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/facebook-logo-240.jpg" />Facebook wants to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN059738320100205">take over the display advertising</a> on its larger-than-life social network. In the process, it will stop using Microsoft (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) to display the majority of advertising at what is becoming one of the most heavily-trafficked pieces of Internet real estate globally.</p>
<p>Is Microsoft angry? It should be -- every time the world's largest software company crafts some small way to try and compete with Internet advertising leader Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), the rugs gets pulled from under it.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/facebook-boots-microsoft-display-ads/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook Boots Microsoft Display Ads</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/facebook-boots-microsoft-display-ads/">Facebook Boots Microsoft Display Ads</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN059738320100205>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/facebook-boots-microsoft-display-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19347464/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/facebook-boots-microsoft-display-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bing search</category><category>Facebook</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook Grows as a Source for News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/facebook-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />How are readers finding the news? Well, increasingly, <a target="_blank" href="http://digital.venturebeat.com/2010/02/03/is-facebook-becoming-a-portal/?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=twitter-publisher-main&amp;utm_campaign=twitter">the answer is Facebook</a>. The social networking site, which boasts well over 350 million registered users, is now the fourth largest referral source of traffic to online news destinations. Almost a year ago, only 0.5% of traffic to news and media sites came from <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a>. Today, that level is 3.5%, according to <a target="_blank" href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2010/02/facebook_largest_news_reader_1.html">data from Web analytics firm Experian Hitwise</a>.</p>
<p>Only Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), Yahoo! (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and MSN (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) send more traffic to news sites. <a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com">Google News</a>, a subset of the search engine giant, failed to keep pace with Facebook, despite the fact that it exists specifically to send Internet users to media outlets. Only 1.39% of referrals came from this source.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook Grows as a Source for News</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/">Facebook Grows as a Source for News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19347948/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>experian</category><category>facebook</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hitwise</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>msn</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times company</category><category>news</category><category>news corp</category><category>newspapers</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><category>wall street journal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google a Vampire in Cuban's Eyes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-a-vampire-in-cubans-eyes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-a-vampire-in-cubans-eyes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-a-vampire-in-cubans-eyes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/mark_cuban.jpg" />You have to love Mark Cuban. The guy basically hasn't stopped chattering about tech and business since selling Broadcast.com to Yahoo! Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) for billions at the height of the dotcom boom almost a decade ago. Although opinionated, much of what comes out of Cuban's mouth is prescient or garbage. The NBA aside, Cuban's latest foe is none other than Google Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). The company that promises to "do no evil" is being called a "vampire" by the billionaire blabbermouth. How touching.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-a-vampire-in-cubans-eyes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google a Vampire in Cuban's Eyes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-a-vampire-in-cubans-eyes/">Google a Vampire in Cuban's Eyes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gigaom.com/2010/02/02/mark-cuban-tells-media-google-is-a-vampire/?utm_source=gigaom&amp;utm_medium=navigation>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-a-vampire-in-cubans-eyes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19342898/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-a-vampire-in-cubans-eyes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Content Aggregation</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google to Team Up with the National Security Agency]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-to-team-up-with-the-national-security-agency/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-to-team-up-with-the-national-security-agency/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-to-team-up-with-the-national-security-agency/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/google-logo-240.gif"  alt="" />Internet search behemoth Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is looking for ways to help ward off cyberattacks, and it appears that they have turned to the National Security Agency (NSA). <p>
According to the <em>Washington Post</em>, an <a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/03/AR2010020304057_pf.html">agreement between the two is being finalized</a>. The agreement would help Google with its recent "corporate espionage attack" that it believes originated in China. This attack targeted the company's computer networks. The alliance would help Google, and its users, from any future attacks.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-to-team-up-with-the-national-security-agency/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google to Team Up with the National Security Agency</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-to-team-up-with-the-national-security-agency/">Google to Team Up with the National Security Agency</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-to-team-up-with-the-national-security-agency/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19344782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/google-to-team-up-with-the-national-security-agency/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cyber attack</category><category>cyber attacks</category><category>cyber security</category><category>cyberattacks</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Internet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Matthew Aid</category><category>National Security Agency</category><category>NSA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google to Get on the App-Store Bandwagon?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/google-to-get-on-the-app-store-bandwagon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/google-to-get-on-the-app-store-bandwagon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/google-to-get-on-the-app-store-bandwagon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goog.jpg" alt="" />Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) Apps -- which includes a suite of cloud-computing programs like Gmail, Google Docs and Google Sites -- has a decent footprint, with more than two million business customers. However, the company realizes it needs to do more as competitors come into the market, like Microsoft (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and IBM (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>). Yes, the cloud is getting crowded.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/google-to-get-on-the-app-store-bandwagon/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google to Get on the App-Store Bandwagon?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/google-to-get-on-the-app-store-bandwagon/">Google to Get on the App-Store Bandwagon?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/google-to-get-on-the-app-store-bandwagon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19341694/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/google-to-get-on-the-app-store-bandwagon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cloud computing</category><category>CloudComputing</category><category>crm</category><category>goog</category><category>google app store</category><category>GoogleAppStore</category><category>ibm</category><category>inthenews</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Baidu.com Could Benefit from Google's Misfortunes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/baidu-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Yesterday was a good day for Baidu (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/baidu-inc-ads/bidu/nas">BIDU</a>), the Chinese Internet search portal, after some Wall Street analysts noted that the departure of Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) from China could "<a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/baidu-shares-regain-momentum-on-google-flap-2010-02-01">benefit Baidu tremendously</a>."</p>
<p>BIDU has traded well in the United States, hovering in the upper reaches of the $380 region -- but GOOG's decision to operate in China without censoring local search results after recent cyber attacks pushed BIDU as high as $470 before the stock settled into the lower $400s.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Baidu.com Could Benefit from Google's Misfortunes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/">Baidu.com Could Benefit from Google's Misfortunes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19341142/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baidu</category><category>Baidu.com</category><category>BIDU</category><category>cyber attack</category><category>CyberAttack</category><category>featured</category><category>Internet search</category><category>inthenews</category><category>search engine</category><category>search portal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vringo Wants to Ring Up an IPO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/vringo-wants-to-ring-up-an-ipo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/vringo-wants-to-ring-up-an-ipo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/vringo-wants-to-ring-up-an-ipo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/vringo-logo.jpg"  alt="" />Roughly a third of all mobile users download ringtones and 40% change them on a frequent basis (according to a study from Ipsos MediaCT). More importantly, ringtones are a lucrative source of revenues for mobile carriers and content owners.</p>
<p>To keep up the innovation, the next phase in the market is actually video ringtones. And this is the focus of Vringo, which has <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1410428/000119312510016082/ds1.htm">filed to go public</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/vringo-wants-to-ring-up-an-ipo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Vringo Wants to Ring Up an IPO</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/vringo-wants-to-ring-up-an-ipo/">Vringo Wants to Ring Up an IPO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/vringo-wants-to-ring-up-an-ipo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19337389/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/vringo-wants-to-ring-up-an-ipo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>BlackBerry</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>IPOs</category><category>Maxim Group</category><category>RIM</category><category>RIMM</category><category>ring tones</category><category>Vringo</category><category>Warburg Pincus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft Q2 Earnings Jump, Aided by Windows 7]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/microsoft-grows-net-income-in-q2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/microsoft-grows-net-income-in-q2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/microsoft-grows-net-income-in-q2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/microsoft.jpg" alt="" />Microsoft (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), the tech giant behind the Windows operating system, whose colleagues include Apple (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>), Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), IBM (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>), and Yahoo! (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), issued <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/microsoft-reports-record-second-quarter-results/rfid293975023?channel=pf">Q2 numbers</a> after the bell on Thursday. Revenues increased 14%, and diluted earnings per share went up well over 50% to 74 cents.</p>
<p>In terms of expectations, <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=msft">Earnings.com</a> says 59 cents was the number to beat. Obviously, the company had no problem doing that. As the <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-28/microsoft-s-profit-beats-estimates-after-release-of-windows-7.html">news outlets</a> have been reporting, Windows 7 was the big driver of the quarter's success.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/microsoft-grows-net-income-in-q2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft Q2 Earnings Jump, Aided by Windows 7</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/microsoft-grows-net-income-in-q2/">Microsoft Q2 Earnings Jump, Aided by Windows 7</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/microsoft-reports-record-second-quarter-results/rfid293975023?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/microsoft-grows-net-income-in-q2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19336602/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/microsoft-grows-net-income-in-q2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>google</category><category>IBM</category><category>international business machines</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>software</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>windows 7</category><category>Windows7</category><category>yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn Release New Features with Revenue Implications]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/facebook-screen-240.jpg" />The three major social media sites have been pushing new tools out to their user communities aggressively over the past year. Each company has its own set of rumors, from IPOs to being on both sides of an acquisition. While the ultimate 2010 aims of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/LinkedIn/">LinkedIn</a> may not have been revealed to us yet, it is clear that all three are looking for ways to beef up revenue and demonstrate long-term viability.</p>
<p>Whether or not Facebook goes public this year, it's still pointed toward that ultimate goal. The 350-million member social network is focused on finding new sources of revenue and gaining better penetration into those it already has. Even if it's more than a year away, it's never too soon to start shoring up your financial statements for an IPO. The latest new feature from Facebook, which has been announcing enhancements fairly rapidly over the past few months, is targeted directly at advertisers, underscoring the importance that the company's attaching to revenue growth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn Release New Features with Revenue Implications</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/">Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn Release New Features with Revenue Implications</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19333479/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ipo</category><category>linkedin</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>social networking sites</category><category>social networks</category><category>SocialNetworkingSites</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook Unfriends IPO for 2010]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/facebook-unfriends-ipo-for-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/facebook-unfriends-ipo-for-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/facebook-unfriends-ipo-for-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/facebook-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />It looks like 2010 will be a strong year for IPOs, especially for tech offerings. Of course, one of the most highly-anticipated deals is Facebook. No doubt, it would give the market a big jolt.<br /> <br /> But sadly, it looks like we may have to wait. At a <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-facebook-investors-no-2010-ipo-for-facebook/">conference</a> in Munich, Facebook's two largest investors -- Jim Breyer of Accel Partners and Yuri Milner of Digital Sky Technologies (DST) -- said "no" to an IPO in 2010. <br /> <em><br /> </em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/facebook-unfriends-ipo-for-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook Unfriends IPO for 2010</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/facebook-unfriends-ipo-for-2010/">Facebook Unfriends IPO for 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/facebook-unfriends-ipo-for-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19332002/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/facebook-unfriends-ipo-for-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Accel Partners</category><category>AccelPartners</category><category>Digital Sky</category><category>DigitalSky</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Facebook IPO</category><category>FacebookIpo</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>Jim Breyer</category><category>JimBreyer</category><category>Yuri Milner</category><category>YuriMilner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings Highlights: American Express, Coach, GE, Google, IBM, McDonald's ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/23/earnings-highlights-american-express-coach-ge-google-ibm-m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/23/earnings-highlights-american-express-coach-ge-google-ibm-m/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/23/earnings-highlights-american-express-coach-ge-google-ibm-m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/coh/" rel="tag">Coach Inc (COH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xrx/" rel="tag">Xerox Corp (XRX)</a></p><p>Here are some highlights from this past week's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" target="_blank">earnings coverage</a> on BloggingStocks:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>American Express Co.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) doubled its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/23/a-look-at-three-quarterly-reports-kimberly-clark-xerox-americ/">bottom line in Q4</a> while its provisions for losses fell.</li>
    <li><strong>Blockbuster Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">BBI</a>) warned of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/more-pain-for-blockbuster-after-weak-forecast/">weakness in Q4</a> and lowered its guidance, sending shares lower.</li>
    <li><strong>Coach Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/coach-inc/coh/nys">COH</a>) better-than-expected <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/coach-sells-off-on-a-decent-quarter/">Q2 earnings</a> were accompanied by sales growth, but shares fell.</li>
    <li><strong>Comerica Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/comerica-incorporated/cma/nys">CMA</a>) posted a smaller-than-expected <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/comerica-soars-to-52-week-high-on-q4-earnings/">Q4 loss</a>, sending shares to a 52-week high.</li>
    <li><strong>CSX Corp.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/csx-corporation/csx/nys">CSX</a>) posted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/csx-drops-on-missed-q4-revenue/">Q4 earnings</a> that topped estimates but its revenue fell short of expectations.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/23/earnings-highlights-american-express-coach-ge-google-ibm-m/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings Highlights: American Express, Coach, GE, Google, IBM, McDonald's ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/23/earnings-highlights-american-express-coach-ge-google-ibm-m/">Earnings Highlights: American Express, Coach, GE, Google, IBM, McDonald's ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/23/earnings-highlights-american-express-coach-ge-google-ibm-m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19328671/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/23/earnings-highlights-american-express-coach-ge-google-ibm-m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Express</category><category>AXP</category><category>BBI</category><category>Blockbuster</category><category>CMA</category><category>Coach</category><category>COH</category><category>Comerica</category><category>CSX</category><category>earnings</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IBM</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>Seagate</category><category>STX</category><category>SYNA</category><category>Synaptics</category><category>Xerox</category><category>XRX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google Delivers in the Fourth Quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/google-delivers-in-the-fourth-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/google-delivers-in-the-fourth-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/google-delivers-in-the-fourth-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/google-logo-240.gif"  alt="" />Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) proudly posted its <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/google-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2009-results/rfid291641557?channel=pf">fourth-quarter numbers</a> on Thursday after the bell, probably assuming it would see a bid once the market digested its performance. But it didn't happen. Instead, the market sold the company on what I would call a very good report. Are you getting the feeling that the bullish sentiment on Wall Street is fading away?</p>
<p>The search giant, feared by both Microsoft (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and Yahoo! (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), among others, said it made $6.79 per share on a non-<a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/Generally%20Accepted%20Accounting%20Principles%20-%20GAAP">GAAP</a> basis. Which means management grew the bottom line by a more than respectable 33%. According to our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/googles-q4-is-here-what-should-we-expect/">earnings preview</a>, the market was looking for $6.43.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/google-delivers-in-the-fourth-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Delivers in the Fourth Quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/google-delivers-in-the-fourth-quarter/">Google Delivers in the Fourth Quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/google-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2009-results/rfid291641557?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/google-delivers-in-the-fourth-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19326724/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/google-delivers-in-the-fourth-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the Bell: Stocks Headed for a  Mixed Start]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/before-the-bell-stocks-headed-for-lower-start/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/before-the-bell-stocks-headed-for-lower-start/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/before-the-bell-stocks-headed-for-lower-start/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-black-white.jpg" alt="" />U.S. stock futures were mixed Friday morning as investors mulled results from General Electric and others, and focused on the effects President Obama's plan to overhaul Wall Street would have on banks.<br />
<br />
On Thursday, Wall Street suffered one of the worst day in month after the Obama administration announced a proposal to increase regulation on the financial industry. Despite several strong earnings, concerns over China's efforts to curb lending, a surprise increase in jobless claims and a drop in manufacturing amounted to the Dow industrials sinking 213 points, or 2%. The broader S&amp;P 500 lost 1.9% and the Nasdaq composite tumbled 1.1%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/before-the-bell-stocks-headed-for-lower-start/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Before the Bell: Stocks Headed for a  Mixed Start</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/before-the-bell-stocks-headed-for-lower-start/">Before the Bell: Stocks Headed for a  Mixed Start</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/before-the-bell-stocks-headed-for-lower-start/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19327405/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/before-the-bell-stocks-headed-for-lower-start/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's Q4 Is Here: What Should We Expect?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/googles-q4-is-here-what-should-we-expect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/googles-q4-is-here-what-should-we-expect/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/googles-q4-is-here-what-should-we-expect/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/google-logo-240.gif"  alt="" />A big player in the tech sector is ready to report today. Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) will publish Q4 results later this afternoon. Traders and investors alike get super excited when the search behemoth tells the world how it's doing.</p>
<p>I think the company will show that it's doing quite well. According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=GOOG">Earnings.com</a>, expectations peg the per-share profit at $6.43. If that number is hit, then the growth rate will be a solid 26% (last year at this time, Google made $5.10 per share). Of course, most people aren't interested in hitting the projected stat, they want management to rise above it and demonstrate true earnings power.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/googles-q4-is-here-what-should-we-expect/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google's Q4 Is Here: What Should We Expect?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/googles-q4-is-here-what-should-we-expect/">Google's Q4 Is Here: What Should We Expect?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=GOOG>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/googles-q4-is-here-what-should-we-expect/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19325004/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/googles-q4-is-here-what-should-we-expect/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>nexus one</category><category>NexusOne</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: Google February Volatility Elevated at 33 into EPS]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/options-update-google-february-volatility-elevated-at-33-into-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/options-update-google-february-volatility-elevated-at-33-into-e/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/options-update-google-february-volatility-elevated-at-33-into-e/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><strong><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/aol-fly-logo.gif" alt="" /></strong>Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas/option-chains">GOOG</a>) closed at $580.42. GOOG is expected to report Q4 EPS on January 21. GOOG February option implied volatility is at 33, March is at 30, above its 26-week average of 28, according to Track Data, suggesting larger near term price movement.</p>
<p>Russell 2000 (</span><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ishares-trust-russell-2000-index-fund/iwm/nys/option-chains">IWM</a>) overall implied volatility at 24; 26-week average is 29.<br />
<br />
Financial Select Sector (</span><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/select-sector-spdr-amex-financial-sel-index/xlf/nys/option-chains">XLF</a>) overall volatility at 24; 26-week average is 30.</p>
<p><em>Options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/options-update-google-february-volatility-elevated-at-33-into-e/">Options Update: Google February Volatility Elevated at 33 into EPS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/options-update-google-february-volatility-elevated-at-33-into-e/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19325503/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/options-update-google-february-volatility-elevated-at-33-into-e/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Financial Select Sector-XLF</category><category>FinancialSelectSector-xlf</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>Russell 2000-IWM</category><category>Russell2000-iwm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple to Join Forces with Microsoft to Fend Off Google?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/apple-to-join-forces-with-microsoft-to-fend-off-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/apple-to-join-forces-with-microsoft-to-fend-off-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/apple-to-join-forces-with-microsoft-to-fend-off-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/iphones-240.jpg" alt="" />Here's something many of us thought would never happen: Apple Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) teaming up with Microsoft Corporation (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) for, well, anything. The mighty Google Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is the common enemy. How so? Check out the embedded Google services on the Apple iPhone.</p>
<p>With internet search on mobile devices becoming the <em>soup du jour</em> in tech circles, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2010/tc20100119_759795.htm">whoever wins mobile search on the iPhone</a> is due some greatness. So far, Google has been there. With Google's Android mobile operating system becoming more and more of a perceived competitor to the iPhone, Apple probably wants Google off the iPhone. It makes logical sense, and it would not be the first time that Microsoft's has cozied up to Apple.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/apple-to-join-forces-with-microsoft-to-fend-off-google/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple to Join Forces with Microsoft to Fend Off Google?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/apple-to-join-forces-with-microsoft-to-fend-off-google/">Apple to Join Forces with Microsoft to Fend Off Google?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2010/tc20100119_759795.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/apple-to-join-forces-with-microsoft-to-fend-off-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19323826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/apple-to-join-forces-with-microsoft-to-fend-off-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Android</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iPhone</category><category>iPhone search</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google Stops Launch of Two Phones in China]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/google-stops-launch-of-two-phones-in-china/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/google-stops-launch-of-two-phones-in-china/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/google-stops-launch-of-two-phones-in-china/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/android-logo-200.jpg" alt="" />Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has been kind of harsh with its Chinese web presence recently (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704362004575000440265987982.html">with good reason</a>), and now the world's largest information company (like that?) may not want to see two new smartphones that feature its Android operating system released in China. Why? Because the future of anything-Google in China is in jeopardy at the moment. In other words, Google's "do no evil" motto is finally catching up to it in the world's largest country by population -- but also one of the most repressed as its economy continues expanding.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/google-stops-launch-of-two-phones-in-china/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Stops Launch of Two Phones in China</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/google-stops-launch-of-two-phones-in-china/">Google Stops Launch of Two Phones in China</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/article/14914/comms/google-blocks-launch-of-samsung-and-motorola-phones-in-china>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/google-stops-launch-of-two-phones-in-china/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19322002/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/google-stops-launch-of-two-phones-in-china/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>GOOG</category><category>inthenews</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are Tech IPOs Passe?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/are-tech-ipos-passe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/are-tech-ipos-passe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/are-tech-ipos-passe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/crm/" rel="tag">salesforce.com inc (CRM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/princeofsiliconvalley.jpg" />A new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312555601?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0312555601"><em>The Prince of Silicon Valley</em></a><img style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0312555601" width="1" height="1" />, chronicles the dealmaking of the IPO king of the 1990s: Frank Quattrone. He made a fortune as he helped more than 100 tech companies go public, which included marquee names like Cisco (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>), Netscape and Amazon.com (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>).</p>
<p>But those days seem quaint. In fact, the tech IPO market has been a backwater for the past decade, even though there have been some big deals -- like the offerings of Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and Salesforce.com (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/salesforce-com-inc/crm/nys">CRM</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/are-tech-ipos-passe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are Tech IPOs Passe?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/are-tech-ipos-passe/">Are Tech IPOs Passe?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/are-tech-ipos-passe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19320319/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/are-tech-ipos-passe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Cisco</category><category>CRM</category><category>CSCO</category><category>Frank Quattrone</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Netscape</category><category>Prince of Silicon Valley</category><category>salesforce.com</category><category>Tech IPOs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times Online Business Model Could Be Only Days Away]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/new-york-times-logo-200.jpg" />The <em>New York Times</em> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) has been struggling to figure out the web, which has led to a debate over whether to charge for electrons that has spanned years. Well, the Times seems likely to take the plunge, hoping to replicate the successes of the <a href="http://www.ft.com" target="_blank"><em>Financial Times</em></a> and <em><a href="http://www.wsj.com">Wall Street Journal</a></em> ... except, of course, that the <a><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a><em> </em>is famous for not really delivering profits. Fortunately, the new pay wall is expected to look more like the <em>Financial Times </em>than the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com" target="_blank"><em>New York Times</em></a> is considering a "metered" system. Visitors will be able to read a certain number of articles free before being required to subscribe.</p>
<p>A friend of Arthur Sulzberger, according to <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/01/new_york_times_set_to_mimic_ws.html" target="_blank"><em>New York Magazine</em>'s Daily Intel</a>, said that the final word could come in a few days, a sentiment corroborated by a newsroom source who said that the plan could be announced within weeks. Yet, plans need to be implemented, so it could take months for the Times to begin charging for content.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York Times Online Business Model Could Be Only Days Away</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/">New York Times Online Business Model Could Be Only Days Away</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19320705/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>Apple</category><category>apple tablet</category><category>arthur sulzberger</category><category>featured</category><category>financial times</category><category>ft</category><category>FT.com</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>maureen dowd</category><category>media</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york times</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes.com</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>tablet</category><category>Tom Friedman</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>wsj</category><category>WSJ.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stay Away from Microsoft's Browser, Warns German Government]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/ie-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />The German government recommends <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-16/germany-says-don-t-use-explorer-until-microsoft-patches-flaw.html">using browsers other than Internet Explorer</a> until Microsoft Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) provides a patch to fix a critical security flaw that allowed a cyber attack against Google Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>).</p>
<p class="indent">In a statement posted on its website, Germany's Federal Office for Information Security warned that attacks by hackers "cannot be fully prevented," even if users run Microsoft's browser in safe mode.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Stay Away from Microsoft's Browser, Warns German Government</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/">Stay Away from Microsoft's Browser, Warns German Government</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19319907/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>browsers</category><category>China</category><category>cyber attacks</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IE</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>