Lita Epstein
Florida - http://www.litaepstein.com
Lita Epstein, who earned her MBA from Emory University’s Goizueta Business School, enjoys helping people develop good financial, investing and tax planning skills. While getting her MBA, Lita worked as a teaching assistant for the financial accounting department and ran the accounting lab. After completing her MBA, she managed finances for a small non-profit organization and for the facilities management section of a large medical clinic. She’s written over 20 books including "Trading for Dummies," "Reading Financial Reports for Dummies" and "Complete Idiot’s Guide to Improving Your Credit Score."
FeedPosted Dec 23rd 2008 10:10AM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Scandals
This post is part of our feature on Money Losers of 2008. See all 20.
Back in the early 2000s, Spitzer was the champion of investors battling evil on Wall Street, and he was much more aggressive than the SEC. The SEC finally got mad and asked that Spitzer coordinate his efforts with them. I doubt many of the investigations that Spitzer led in the early 2000s would ever have happened if he waited around for the SEC to act. He was even named "Crusader of the Year" in 2002 by Time magazine.
Spitzer used the points he won as a popular New York State Attorney General to win the governor's race, but things quickly went downhill. First there was the scandal involving his aides who attempted to embarrass Republican state Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno because of the use of state aircraft. Then Spitzer lost more popularity when he made it easier for illegal immigrants to get driver's licenses.
But being named as Client 9 in a prostitution ring took him down. Investigators found out about the ring when they followed the money after seeing funds moving from his accounts in a suspicious manner. In the end it was reported that Spitzer spent $80,000 on prostitutes. A measly sum when you consider the other money losers in this year's nominations. But for Spitzer it's more about losing power than losing money.
Sadly, he proved his own words to the BBC is 2006, "Everyone is susceptible to the notion that when you begin to do well, you begin to see no boundary lines and forget the rules apply."
Be sure to check out more Money Losers of 2008.
Posted Dec 19th 2008 10:25AM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad News

The digital age finally took down Polaroid.
Polaroid filed for bankruptcy to restructure its debt. Yet Polaroid's CEO Mary Jeffries says the company will continue operations.
She told CNN, "Our operations are strong and during this process Polaroid will ship products to our retail partners, work with our suppliers and contract manufacturers to fulfill retailer demand." She promised employees would receive their pay without interruption and said there would be new product launches in 2009.
The bankruptcy filing was necessary because of an investigation of its parent company, Petters Group Worldwide, which has owned Polaroid since 2005, according to a statement by Polaroid when the bankruptcy was announced. Polaroid went on to say the Petters Group founder and other employees are under investigation for fraud and that the investigation does not involve its leadership team.
While I know Polaroid is remaking itself in the new digital age, it's still hard to imagine this former leader in the world of photography being forced into bankruptcy. I'm rooting for it to survive bankruptcy and come back strong. I still remember the excitement of using my Polaroid when I was younger.
Lita Epstein has written more than 25 books including the "Complete Idiot's Guide to Value Investing" due out in January."Posted Dec 19th 2008 9:20AM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Personal Finance
As the story unfolds, winning investors find that even though they took their funds out, they may have to repay some of their gains. That's because of something called "clawbacks." A court could rule that anyone who gained money from Madoff's Ponzi scheme must
repay some of the gains even if the person had no idea the gains were fraudulent.When it comes to a Ponzi scheme, unknowing early investors make their profits because the money from later investors is used to pay those profits. In the
New York Times story this morning, the
Times reviews the records of one investor who made millions with Madoff, even though he still had several million dollars in his account when the fund collapsed last week. The
Times did not reveal his name because he is afraid he could be sought out to repay some of his gains.
Based on previous court rulings involving other frauds, winners have reason to worry. In past scandals they have had to give up some of their gains to even up the losses. Losers are likely to receive just 20 to 40 percent of their original investment. Clawbacks will help in an attempt to repay some of the losses.
Clawbacks could impact investors who received gains over the last six years, but how far back the courts will decide to go will be determined in the future when all the facts are known. Some believe investors could also sue other investors who drew them into this fraud. Whatever happens Madoff-related lawsuits will probably fill the courts for years.
Right now the
Times reports only $20 billion of the possible $50 billion in losses have been identified, but more losers are expected to come forward. The $50 billion estimate is the number suggested by Madoff when he confessed to the fraud.
Lita Epstein has written more than 25 books including "Reading Financial Reports for Dummies."Posted Dec 17th 2008 12:02PM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC Filings, Market Matters, Money and Finance Today, Politics

Christopher Cox, trying to protect his own reputation, is now
calling for an internal investigation of the SEC to find out how the Madoff Ponzi scheme went undetected for 10 years. Was Cox asleep at the wheel or was he just oblivious to what was going on in his own agency. Did a
personal relationship between one an SEC attorney and a Madoff compliance lawyer hamper investigation, as Blogging Stocks Peter Cohen questions?
Cox, feeling the heat, ordered a full and immediate review of past allegations against Madoff and his firm. He wants to know why staff didn't act upon them. This investigation will include all staff contact with Madoff family members.
Well maybe we'll find out some of these answers, but even if we do the damage is done to all the individuals and institutions that took a beating while the SEC slept. The SEC admitted as this investigation started that Bernard Madoff and his securities firm had "repeatedly" been under question by the SEC staff since 1999, but staff never recommended action to the commission.
Continue reading Cox admits failure - calls for internal investigation of Madoff dealings
Posted Dec 16th 2008 1:20PM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Market Matters, Money and Finance Today, Politics

When Christopher Cox was appointed by President George Bush to head the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, some people compared it to putting the fox in charge of the hen house -- certain he would destroy all that had been built by one of the SEC's most effective leaders, Arthur Levitt. Wall Street wanted someone who it knew would reduce regulation and enforcement. They got what they wished for -- but are they pleased with the results? Probably not. Arthur Levitt was tough to deal with but I doubt any of this Wall Street mess would have happened if he were still in control of the SEC.
The Bernard Madoff scandal is just another in a long string of missteps from the agency Christopher Cox helped to dismantle. Cox's budget cuts and the regulation changes he encouraged removed the SEC's enforcement division's teeth, making it
harder for the agency to impose penalties on corporations.
Christopher Cox rarely took a stance against anything Wall Street could dream up. When Bear Stearns was in trouble, he was like Nero declaring there wasn't a problem as Rome burned. Just three days after Cox assured investors all was well, Bear Stearns collapsed.
Continue reading Dismantling of a once-proud agency: The S.E.C.
Posted Dec 13th 2008 9:40AM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Insiders, Wal-Mart (WMT)
This post is part of our feature on Money Winners of 2008. See all 20.
Think you could live comfortably on $23 billion? That's what each of the four Walton heirs live on today thanks to the company built by their father or father-in-law Sam Walton -- Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT). Walton heirs were beat out by only three other billionaires for the top spot on the Forbes 400 Richest Americans list in 2008 -- William Gates, Warren Buffett, and Lawrence Ellison.
Only two of the Walton heirs have anything to do with the company from which they get their riches. S. Robson Walton is chairman of the board and he has served on the Wal-Mart board since 1978. Jim Walton is a member of the board, which he joined in 2005. Alice and Christy Walton, who are not involved in the running of Wal-Mart, do get the richest women in America title thanks to their Wal-Mart holdings. The Walton heirs recovered from a rough spot in 2006 when their stock holdings dropped to $18 billion and they fell to 17 to 20 on the Forbes list.
So who are are Walton heirs?
Jim Walton ($23.4 billion and #4 on the Forbes list), son of Sam Walton, is 60 years old and married with four children (future Walton heirs). He lives in Bentonville, Ark., and chairs the Arvest Bank Group. He got his BA at the University of Arkansas. He joined the Wal-Mart board in 2005.
Continue reading Money winners of 2008: Wal-Mart heirs still among wealthiest Americans
Posted Dec 11th 2008 10:40AM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Federal Natl Mtge (FNM), Housing, Recession, Financial Crisis

Finally, some good news for the holidays, but as always these day, with grain of salt.
Foreclosure filings dropped 7% in November from the previous month according to RealtyTrac. That's one in every 488 households nationwide. It's up from last November's number by 28%. Most of the reduction in the number of foreclosures can be credited to the moratoriums on foreclosures by
Fannie (NYSE:
FNM) and
Freddie (NYSE:
FRE), as well as by some of the banks the FDIC took over.
Still, 78,179 families lost their home to foreclosure in November. That is down by 8% from the number of families that lost their homes in October - 84,868. A total of 1,014,618 homes have been lost because of foreclosure since this crisis started in August 2007.
You'll probably see more good news in December as the foreclosure moratoriums continue, but January will likely be another story. The idea behind these moratoriums is that people find a way to avoid foreclosure through mortgage modification or refinance. That may be true and possible when the economy isn't in the sorry state it is.
Continue reading Moratoriums reduce foreclosure filings by 7% -- at least temporarily
Posted Dec 10th 2008 3:57PM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Ford Motor (F), Citigroup Inc. (C), Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Amer Intl Group (AIG), Politics
Companies that contributed millions to the Republican and Democratic conventions got a very quick payback this year -- billions in bailout money. Some of the major bailout beneficiaries that gave money for the conventions include AIG (NYSE: AIG), Ford (NYSE: F), Citigroup (NYSE: C), and Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), according to USA Today.
More than $115 million were given to the nominating conventions for Barack Obama and John McCain according to reports released by the Campaign Finance Institute and the Center for Responsive Politics. Private financing of conventions is one of the few ways big corporations can give big bucks to influence political favors.
So who's benefiting and what do they get back:
- American International Group Inc. gave $750,000 to both the Democratic convention in Denver and the Republican convention in Minneapolis-St. Paul. Its payback: $150 billion financial-rescue package.
-
Citigroup gave a total of $600,0000 in allowable donations with $250,000 of that going to the Democratic convention. Its payback: tens of billions in bailout funds.
-
Goldman Sachs spent $505,000 on the conventions, including $255,000 for the Republicans. Its payback: $10 billion in bailout money.
Continue reading Big payoffs for companies that foot the bill for political conventions
Posted Dec 9th 2008 6:40PM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Housing, Recession, Financial Crisis
This post is part of AOL Money & Finance's Best & Worst in Money 2008 feature.
The year 2008 brought the word "greed" to new levels with major companies going bankrupt thanks to the greed of their top execs, who were more worried about lining their own pockets than about the interests of their customers and shareholders. This greed also helped to fuel the housing bubble that burst and sent home prices falling in what seems like an unending downward spiral. As the financial news continues to worsen, it's hard to pick the biggest money story of the year. We've pulled together our top four picks, and it's up to you to vote on the biggest money story of the year.
Here are our top four picks in alphabetical order:
Collapse of Wall Street
The world hasn't seen so many Wall Street firms go bust since the Great Depression, and we seem to be teetering on the edge of another worldwide depression. Top Wall Street execs pocketed millions, and in some cases, billions of dollars thanks to sales of complex financial instruments that it appears no one truly understood (or if they did understand their toxic natures they perpetrated a huge fraud on the investors who bought them). Now these same executives pocket millions in golden parachutes as they leave the firms they destroyed. And, while they enjoy their millions, investors, customers and employees of these now defunct or badly bruised firms face destroyed careers and/or portfolios.
Continue reading Best & Worst in Money 2008: Money story of the year
Posted Dec 6th 2008 6:40PM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Personal Finance, Commodities, Housing, Recession, Financial Crisis
This post is part of AOL Money & Finance's Best & Worst in Money 2008 feature.
Consumers took it in the chin so many times this year, it's surprising many of us are still standing. Consumer credit for student loans, mortgages, car loans and just about everything else dried up completely by October. Oil prices soared, drained our pocketbooks, and then dropped like a stone after doing the damage. Food prices continue to soar as the prices for our homes and the value of our retirement funds plummet. So how does one decide, which is the most disturbing consumer trend? Let's look at our top four picks, presented in alphabetical order.
Americans with good credit struggling to get loans at favorable rates
While rates are starting to come down thanks to the latest bailout by the Fed, good deals are hard to find. Most banks are hoarding their cash and only lending it out to those with credit scores over 760. Even then, rates are not that favorable. You can only think about applying for a mortgage or equity line if you have at least 90 percent equity in a home that has probably lost value and, in most cases, you must have 80 percent equity to get a home loan. How can the U.S. stop the downward spiral in home values until credit is available for qualified buyers?
Continue reading Best & Worst in Money 2008: Most disturbing consumer trend
Posted Dec 4th 2008 6:40PM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Federal Natl Mtge (FNM), Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), , Financial Crisis
This post is part of AOL Money & Finance's Best & Worst in Money 2008 feature.
In a year of financial chaos, how can one even narrow the choice of most shocking financial collapse to just five candidates? Financial collapses took down venerable Wall Street firms and government enterprises. Even an entire country fell on the weight of this worldwide financial storm. There were so many financial casualties that the task to narrow this down to just five was difficult. We have chosen these five and placed them in alphabetical order.
Bear Stearns
Bear Stearns held a respected place on Wall Street dating back to before the Great Depression, but in March 2008, this once-respected Wall Street firm was bought by JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) for just $2 per share (or about $236 million). The stock price had been $36.75 on March 14, 2008 -- just two days before the JPMorgan deal was struck. Bear Stearns had been the most aggressive player in packaging and selling mortgage-backed securities, and their hedge funds were heavily loaded with the junk they sold. Many saw the fall of Bear Stearns as justice because it was the only major Wall Street bank that did not work with the Fed and participate in the $3 billion bailout of Long Term Capital Management in 1998. Payback is a bitch.
Continue reading Best & Worst in Money 2008: Most shocking financial collapse
Posted Dec 4th 2008 11:33AM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Forecasts, Good news, Market Matters, Oil

Oil traders believe the price of
oil could fall below $40 per barrel by the end of the year. Whoever drove prices up to $147.27 per barrel taught the oil industry a valuable lesson in demand destruction that they should have learned during the
oil shocks of the 70s. I can still remember waiting in long lines just to get gas in the late 70s.
After the two oil shocks of the 70s, people did the same thing they are doing now -- bought smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles, thereby reducing demand for many years to come. While there is little doubt in my mind that eventually, as the economic recovery begins to take hold, oil prices will again be driven up to $100 per barrel, it will probably take a few of years.
We'll probably go through a similar cycle as we did in the 70s and 80s. OPEC already is threatening to reduce output. Drilling and exploration projects will be postponed or canceled because the economic incentive to find new oil has been reduced by the prospect of lower gains. Demand will eventually exceed supply as the economy recovers and pressure again is put on available supplies.
Remember, oil is not a renewable source. If the world were smart during this time of lower prices we'd develop alternatives to this nonrenewable source, but I doubt we will. And so, before we know it, oil will again climb to new heights and help cause the same economic destruction it did this time. But the next time, it might actually hit $200 per barrel and create even more havoc on the economic markets.
Lita Epstein has written more than 25 books including the "Complete Idiot's Guide to the Politics of Oil."
Posted Dec 3rd 2008 10:13AM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Forecasts, Market Matters, Personal Finance

America's Research Group, a consumer research firm, lowered its 2008 holiday retail sales forecast. ARG now believes
retail sales will fall 3.5 percent from last year. Previously, ARG predicted just a 1 percent decline.
Chief Executive Britt Beemer told the
New York Times, "When you look at the numbers, you see that over the weekend consumers were frugal and focused, staying within their budgets and concentrating on the deals and advertised specials."
Nineteen percent of the shoppers surveyed by ARG said they had already finished 90 percent of their shopping. That's up from 13.6 percent last year. About 63 percent of people polled said that they would finish their shopping in three days or less. That leaves retailers with the prospect of sluggish sales between now and the end of December when many retailers look for holiday sales to get them back into the black.
Beemer told that
Times that shoppers were disciplined. They made lists and stuck to them. He found that 70.2 percent of shoppers told him that they stayed within budgets.
Continue reading Holiday retail sales forecast to drop 3.5% in 2008
Posted Dec 1st 2008 10:10AM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Market Matters, Politics, Financial Crisis

Experts inside the Bush Administration
tried to warn about the mortgage meltdown. They even proposed new regulations to set guidelines for the risky loans written by the banks who now have their hat in hand looking for a bailout. The banks fought these regulations and the Bush administration caved in. Now, we taxpayers are paying for this lapse in judgment in two ways -- an economic meltdown and a huge tax bill. According to an Associated Press report today, regulators warnings to banks in 2005 included:
- Banks were warned exotic mortgages were often inappropriate for buyers with bad credit. Anyone surprised about that?
- Banks that bundled and sold mortgages were told to be sure investors know what they were buying. We know that's not true. AAA ratings were given to much of this debt that proved to be of much lower quality and much more risky.
- Regulators urged banks to help buyers make responsible decisions and clearly advise people that interest rates might skyrocket and huge payments might be due sooner than expected. Do you believe that mortgage brokers or banks clearly warned people about the dangers of the loans they were taking? I don't.
Continue reading Bush administration ignored regulators' warnings of mortgage meltdown
Posted Nov 25th 2008 9:34AM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Good news, Personal Finance, Housing, Federal Reserve

We've been watching as banks continue to hoard the bailout funds, maybe buy up some other banks, but nothing has trickled down to Main Street. Well, the Federal Reserve announced today that it's committing up to $800 billion to make it easier for Main Street folks to
borrow money for cars, tuition bills and new homes. The Treasury Department is giving up very little of its Congressional bailout funds -- just $20 billion -- to the Fed's consumer lending program.
Did Congress really intend for so little to go to Main Street? I doubt it and I hope that when Henry Paulson comes begging for the second half of the bailout he's told it's not his to spend. Congress might want to wait for the new administration because many are not happy with how Paulson is spending it.
I'm glad to see the Fed is moving in a much more appropriate direction to help get Main Street back on track. The Fed intends to provide up to $200 billion to investors who plan to put the money towards consumer loans, such as credit cards, auto loans and student loans, as well as some forms of small business loans. These will be in the form of one-year loans available only for newly-issued consumer debt. These type of loans totally dried up in October and are essential to get the economy moving again.
Continue reading Fed finally announces bailout to help Main Street
< Previous Page | Next Page >