Carol Vinzant
- http://www.animaltourism.com

Feed

Company nicknames: UPS: Big Brown, much more than a truck color

This post is one in a series on prominent company nicknames. See all 25, and share your thoughts and memories about Big Brown below in the comments.

The simplicity of a brand name or symbol confers status on a company. Decades ago, the symbol might literally have been a stock symbol: the oldest companies got one letter ticker symbols from the New York Stock Exchange. United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS) now gets that status by taking an entire color: brown. (Granted, it's not a primary color like IBM's Big Blue, but it still shows the company's clout.)

The company first started using its trademark brown trucks in the 1920s when it delivered appliances and other goods for department stores, says Mike Brewster, author of Driving Change: The UPS Approach to Business. Pullman brown was a good choice because "their department store clients wanted the company to be more under-stated, because the stores didn't want the fact that they no longer had their own trucks highlighted." That, and the dark trucks were easier to keep looking clean.

Brown is much more than a truck color now. It's the uniform. It's the logo. It's what the company calls itself in commercials. UPS employees bragging about their loyalty will say they "bleed brown." This year the company sponsored a horse named Big Brown, which won two-thirds of the Triple Crown.

But, hard as it is to believe now, UPS almost gave up its trademark color. "The company almost changed the color in the '90s during one of several re-brandings, but decided to stick with brown, much to the disappointment of many in the company," says Brewster. "But the 'What can Brown do for You?' campaign has given the color new life at the company."

Company nicknames: Costco really is the '$100 store'

This post is one in a series on prominent company nicknames. See all 25, and share your thoughts and memories about the $100 store below in the comments.

You know you do it. You walked into Costco (NASDAQ: COST) to save some money on one thing -- just one little thing. In our minds, we do all sorts of calculations. We see ourselves saving money instead of what we're actually doing, spending money. An hour later we walk out loaded down with bulk bargains -- and $100 lighter. That's where Costco gets its increasingly popular nickname: The $100 Store.

Bloggers and consumers have been using the unflattering "$100 store" nickname for a while. And, it turns out they are right. A recent Christian Science Monitor story cites a statistic from the Food Institute: the average visit to a warehouse club costs $93.

The $100 spending phenomena may be a universal phenomena in any of the big-box discounters. But one Harvard professor thinks the membership fees at Costco (and other warehouse clubs) make us think we're getting a better deal than we are. Michael I. Norton, an assistant professor in the Marketing unit at Harvard Business School, says that the presence of fees make people think they're getting a special discount and then they spend more.

"The presence of fees can drive choice of retail outlets, such that stores with membership fees are more popular even when they offer the same goods at the same prices as stores without fees," Norton writes in his working paper. Maybe that idea of paying to shop somewhere was crazy after all.

High-dividend yield in a down market

Yesterday's announcement by Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) to cut but not eliminate its dividend payment got me wondering if there were other companies out there with absurdly high dividend yields that hadn't cut their payments. High-dividend yields are an old-fashioned way to look at companies and one that's fallen out of fashion as tech companies plowed their profits into research. But a 10% yield -- hey even a 7% yield -- is something we'd all be happy to find these days.

Traditionally, companies with high-dividend yields were those with low-growth potential, like utilities. Like Freddie, many of the current high-yield companies were created by a falling stock price. And like Freddie, they could always cut the dividend to keep the yield from getting out of whack. But, if they think the stock will rebound, maybe they won't cut it for fear the dividend cut would be yet another thing to drive off investors.

The highest yielding big company I found was Biovail (NYSE: BVF), Canada's biggest drug maker. The company was hit with an SEC complaint that key executives were lying about earnings. The company and the founder just settled a fight over the future direction of the company -- with the founder stepping aside. The stock, at about $10, has been cut in half in the last year. In May the company declared a quarterly dividend of 37.5 cents a share, which gives it a 15% yield at the current price.

Continue reading High-dividend yield in a down market

Why is Freddie paying any dividend at all?

Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) announced today that it lost $821 million this quarter and cut its quarterly dividend from 25 cents a share to five cents a share, pending board approval. And it's paying the full dividend on preferred stock.

My question is why is this company paying ANY dividend? I know that dividends aren't necessarily just from profits like you might think. But this company lost $1.63 a share, so why is it giving shareholders even a nickel?

We all know this company may be nationalized eventually, however remote that possibility is under the current administration. We all know that taxpayers are on the hook for up to $25 billion or more for the bailout of Fannie and Freddie. And we know the Treasury can now buy shares in Fannie and Freddie to prop them up. But now it's appealing to shareholders' sense of value by keeping a dividend?

Continue reading Why is Freddie paying any dividend at all?

SEC's lame short-selling move means bank stocks will be overvalued

On Tuesday, the Securities and Exchange Commission threw a brushback pitch at those who are betting on the further collapse of our big financial institutions. Instead of suggesting better oversight of the companies, the SEC is going after short sellers.

For 30 days starting Monday, short-selling will be restricted on 19 financial companies. Financial regulators are also cracking down on "sensational rumors." To put the short-selling rule in perspective, consider that even when the market re-opened after the September 11th attacks, the SEC considered, but didn't implement, short sale restrictions.

Since Bear Steans collapsed and Vanity Fair bought the company's story that short-sellers did them in, everyone is worried that short sellers are bringing the market down. And I'm sure they are, but short-selling, after all, is legal. The SEC just loosened rules on it last year.

Yesterday, SEC chair Steven Cox testified that he's worried about short-selling in connection with spreading false rumors to manipulate the market. OK, that's not legal, but as Cox pointed out, the SEC brought its first case -- EVER -- for this sort of deception this year. And it still hasn't gone after anyone for spreading false positive rumors about a company.

Continue reading SEC's lame short-selling move means bank stocks will be overvalued

US Airways cutting movies, charging to sit in front

You've been enjoying yourself too flying US Airways flights, haven't you? No more frivolity. The US Airways experience will make the Chinatown bus look lush. US Airways Group (NASDAQ: LCC) announced these latest passenger torture methods: no movies, no curbside check-in at 34 airports -- and that's on top of recent plans to charge $2 for cokes or coffee. You'll pay extra to use some of your frequent flier rewards, an additional $15 for checked bags and $25 to book on the phone. And if you want a window or aisle seat in the front of coach -- 16% of coach -- it'll cost you $5 to $30 more per segment.

The stock is down about 5% today on these grim announcements and word that the airline is cutting 2,500 jobs (and perhaps on oil prices). It had already planned on cutting capacity, though it had positive news yesterday, with good scores for being on time. US Airways says the current new fees will bring in $250 to $300 to $400 million. I don't think price-conscious passengers are going to remain oblivious to the idea that an airline ticket is not the real price anymore. It'll be like renting a car -- you know that it's really going to cost you twice as much as the rate.

US Airways says it is cutting movie service because the 500-pound machines cost them $10 million in fuel and other costs. It'll keep the movies on flights to Hawaii and overseas. The real problem with the big airplane screens is that nobody is renting the headphones anymore. I don't remember the last time I watched a movie -- or even one of those schlocky sitcoms the airlines seem to love -- on a big airplane screen. We all want our own entertainment -- and bring it in the form of MP3 or DVD players. In an effort to appeal to the broadest audience, the industry has bored everyone. Reuters says that a cut in inflight movies -- if it goes further -- could hurt the entertainment industry, which makes roughly $240 million a year from airlines.


Continue reading US Airways cutting movies, charging to sit in front

American icons owned abroad: Falling dollar, cheaper U.S. assets spurring trend of foreign ownership

Imagine this typical American strip mall: a Trader Joe's, a Sunglass Hut, a Caribou Coffee. Maybe there's a restaurant that serves hot dogs with French's mustard, and a choice of Good Humor ice cream or homemade Toll House chocolate chip cookies for dessert. Across the street is a CITGO, Shell and a 7-Eleven.

All this sounds so American. It could -- and does -- exist all across the country. Yet all of these companies and brands are foreign-owned.

Some of these marquee names were always foreign-owned, but overseas firms are increasingly buying up American properties. Most recently, beer drinkers were shocked when Belgian beer juggernaut InBev put the moves on Anheuser-Busch (NYSE: BUD). [Update: On July 14, Anheuser-Busch agreed to be acquired by InBev for $52 billion.] How could InBev attempt to turn Budweiser into just another of its stable of international brands? We were surprised not only that those European beer snobs even liked our watery brew, but by the apparent ease with which foreigners could try to snap up American icons.

It's not just American brands and companies getting sold. Foreign companies were the buyers in four of the top 13 U.S. commercial real estate deals in 2007, according to Real Estate Alert newsletter. Another foreign acquisition of notable Manhattan real estate was the Dubai-based Jumeirah group's 2006 purchase of the Essex House on Central Park South.

Continue reading American icons owned abroad: Falling dollar, cheaper U.S. assets spurring trend of foreign ownership

Sir John Templeton, best contrarian investor of the 20th Century, dies at 95

One of the greatest investors of the 20th Century, Sir John Templeton, died today in the Bahamas at age 95. If you've invested with a contrarian style or in emerging markets, you probably owe some thanks to what he probably would've called "progress" in those fields.

In the investing world Templeton was known for the work he did on the Templeton Growth Fund, where he was one of the few investors to beat the S&P over the long haul. "If you want to have a better performance than the crowd, you must do things differently from the crowd," he once said.

Templeton did that by exploring the then-completely exotic world of emerging markets. "The other boys at Yale came from wealthy families, and none of them were investing outside the United States, and I thought, 'That is very egotistical. Why be so shortsighted or near-sighted as to focus only on America? Shouldn't you be more open-minded?'"

He also looked for beaten down and neglected companies. He famously bought $100 worth of 104 companies trading at less than $1 in 1937 and quadrupled his money in four years.

In the rest of the world he was known for financing research into what he called spiritual "progress." He felt spirituality and religion were neglected. To change that, he started offering the Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion in 1972, which always makes sure it gives out more money than the Nobel Committee.

Continue reading Sir John Templeton, best contrarian investor of the 20th Century, dies at 95

Who will make the next generation of thinner TVs: Samsung, Sony, Panasonic or Toshiba?

Panasonic, the main American subsidiary of Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.(NYSE:MC) is getting serious about its bet on the next generation of televisions. Panasonic is going with what's known as OEL (organic electroluminescent) or OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) TVs. They're vastly thinner---less than a quarter of an inch---and are supposed to faster, sharper and use less energy. (Some have disputed the last point.) But they could wear out quicker than other TVs, and by organic they just mean carbon based.

Sony (NYSE: SNE) already has the lead in the a OLED TV market. But Sony's TV is only 11 inches and it costs $2,500. They plan to release a 27-inch version "fairly soon," according to this blog dedicated to OLED. Matsushita---which is changing its name to Panasonic come fall---is planning a 37-inch screen for around $1,400, according to Reuters, which was picking the story up from the Japanese newspaper Sankei Shimbun. But that's still years away.

Toshiba (TOSBF) is also working on one, but suffered some delays. Samsung just announced they were investing $530 million in OLED production. There have been plenty of delays in this OLED technology--almost as many as there have been with the rival technology SED (surface-conduction electron-emitter display). Toshiba and Canon (NYSE:CAJ)is the big backers of SED TVs. After years of delays the battle for the next, thinnest TV is heating up.




Big company, small town: 84 Lumber, Eighty Four, Pennsylvania

This post is part of our Big Company, Small Town series, featuring large companies and the small towns in which they are headquartered.

Eighty Four, Pennsylvania, is such a tiny town -- really unincorporated area in Washington County -- that it barely got a name. Instead, it is charmingly known by a number: 84. (Differing historical theories say it was named after its #84 railway mailbox or the 1884 election of Grover Cleveland.) Joe Hardy III liked the name so much that when he opened a lumber yard here in 1956 with his brothers, he named it after the town, 84 Lumber. (Not that he was that picky with names; his previous venture was Green Hills Lumber in nearby Green Hills.)

Even though Eighty Four is only 20 miles south of Pittsburgh, it is a decidedly rural, mountain town. Just off Route 70, Eighty Four, the town, was chosen so 84, the lumber company, could serve its particular tri-state area: Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio. Eighty Four itself is too small for anybody to keep track of, but in Washington County in 2006 the average per capita income was $37,000.

Hardy's hardscrabble, blunt management style fit in well with the area and the lumber trade. The stores were notorious for lacking heat (which some now have). The Wall Street Journal described how Hardy fired his son, the would-be heir, when he slowed down with multiple sclerosis. He went with his daughter, Maggie Hardy-Magerko, instead. Battling big-box retailers, she pushed the company successfully toward specializing in pros instead of do-it-yourselfers.

Continue reading Big company, small town: 84 Lumber, Eighty Four, Pennsylvania

Dell keeps backdoor to XP open -- for a fee

Dell (NASDAQ: DELL) seems to be positioning itself as the de facto corporate champion of saving XP and saving its customers from Microsoft's (NASDAQ: MSFT) much-maligned Vista operating system. Dell announced it would charge $20 to $50 extra to some customers to "downgrade" to Windows XP. Dell even puts the "downgrade" in quotes, the idea is so ridiculous. In reality the fee is more like $100-150 because many customers will have to upgrade their version of Vista to downgrade to XP.

On the surface, this extra charge may sound like bad news, that getting XP is going to be even more difficult. But I see this as a way for Dell to ensure there is still some legitimate way to keep getting XP even after June 30, when Microsoft wants to kill it off.

There's been much speculation about whether Microsoft would relent and postpone the demise of XP another time. I also take this news to mean that it will not. Time's up. In some ways the deadline was just moved up to June 18--that's when Dell stopped pre-installing XP.

Continue reading Dell keeps backdoor to XP open -- for a fee

Hertz giving up on fuel gouging, more rental car companies may follow

Hertz (NYSE:HTZ) has decided to give up on the cash cow of wildly overcharging customers for filling up the tank. Instead of charging $7 a gallon for gas, they'll charge the market price. Oh, don't get me wrong, they'll still charge an outrageous fee for putting gas in the tank when the deal kicks in on July 1. They'll just charge a flat fee of $7 to fill up, plus the market price of gas. What does that translate to in terms of pay, about $100 an hour to pump gas?

I'm pleased that Hertz is getting out of the gas gouging business. Maybe that field has just gotten too competitive lately. It's getting harder to shock Americans with preposterous gas prices. Rental car companies have been charging insane gas rates -- almost what you'd pay in Europe at the pump -- for years. Consumers think of it as their evil little profit center, like phone charges at hotels.

In a story at USAToday, the industry claims that it's only overcharging to scare people into bringing the car back full, so they don't have to hassle with storing the fuel and filling up cars. So why don't they charge that rate for prepaid gas? USAToday did a survey and found that rental car companies sold pre-paid gas at about $4 a gallon, but charged about $8 when someone returned the car less than full.

Continue reading Hertz giving up on fuel gouging, more rental car companies may follow

Developers shun Vista, too

A recent study by Evans Data Corporation shows that developers don't like Vista any more than the rest of us. Six times as many are clinging to XP than switching to Vista. Only 8% of developers are working on programs to run on Vista, compared with 50% who are writing for Windows XP. That's not good news for Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), who hopes that its customers will grudgingly tolerate the withdrawal of XP on June 30.

Many are begging Microsoft to relent, especially InfoWorld. The developers do plan on doing more work for the troubled operating system next year, but still not as many as are hanging onto XP. Next year, 24% of developers expect to target Vista while 29% will still work with XP.

Evans data doesn't say how much the Vista disaster has helped Linux and Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), but it's clear Vista has sent many fleeing. eWeek reported last week that Apple now has a 14% market share -- nearly four times what it had in 2005. Using data from NPD Group, eWeek points out that Apple sells two out of three computers in the $1,000 and above category. That's largely because Macs are still way, way more expensive than PCs. If Apple ever got around to offering a computer at a price the masses were willing to pay, Microsoft might be in trouble. Microsoft may not hear the complaints about its operating system, but it understands that people want to pay less for computers.

Don't worry, the U.S. will make a decent electric car -- by 2014

The Department of Energy announced it was throwing some money at the electric car dream yesterday. They'll spend "up to $30 million in funding over three years" on three projects they hope will produce a viable electric car by 2014. Wow, that's a whole $10 million a year!

The DOE is funding three projects they hope will produce an electric car that can go 40 miles on a charge, enough for 70% of daily commuters. They made the announcement at a conference on Plug-in Electric Vehicles 2008: What Role for Washington? Apparently the Energy Department decided the role was to make a token amount of funding and let other countries take the lead. The plan is to split the cost 50-50 with industry. General Motors (NYSE:GM) is going to work on a Lithium-Ion battery. Ford (NYSE:F) will work on a way to speed up mass production of electric cars. And General Electric (NYSE:GE) will try to figure out a two-battery, 40-mile system.

I'm sure everyone's working on all sorts of other projects, but this one just seems tiny, especially in context of the current oil crisis and the $40.1 billion requested Department of Transportation budget for FY2009. As cNet's Elsa Wenzel helpfully points out, Toyota (NYSE:TM), working with Matsushita Electric Industrial (NYSE:MC), thinks it can mass market an electric car by 2010.

Comstock Partners blames Greenspan for Japan-like crisis

Comstock Partners, one of the most respected (and bearish) value shops on Wall Street, just came out with a special report that gives a grim analysis of the current U.S. economic situation and a harsh indictment of Alan Greenspan's role in creating it.

Charlie Minter and Marty Weiner believe that the Fed has been guilty of over-interfering in the U.S economy. They think Greenspan (in the late 1990s and then again in 2001 after the terrorist attacks) kept money too cheap to stave off an immediate but short-term crisis. We've all nearly forgotten how in 2001 many smart people thought that real estate was overvalued and headed for a fall. Comstock didn't forget.

"The money that was pumped into the economy stopped the market decline and rather than going into a severe recession (which should've and would've happened) we experienced the mildest recession in history," the Comstock fund writes. "Home values were at extremely high valuations in 2001, yet after the stimulus started it drove the valuations to outrageous levels."

Continue reading Comstock Partners blames Greenspan for Japan-like crisis

< Previous Page | Next Page >

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+86.7712,718.77
NASDAQ+17.522,911.28
S&P 500+10.651,341.31

Last updated: May 16, 2012: 10:32 AM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

19.105+0.705(+3.83)

Alcoa

8.815+0.105(+1.21)

Apple Inc

554.06+0.89(+0.16)

Google Inc 'A'

627.92+16.81(+2.75)

Bank of America

7.415+0.115(+1.58)

Wal-Mart Stores

59.61+0.26(+0.44)

Exxon Mobil Corp

82.74+0.95(+1.16)

Ford

10.39+0.24(+2.36)

Citigroup

28.18+0.39(+1.40)

IBM

200.10+1.06(+0.53)

Yahoo

15.47+0.07(+0.45)

Starbucks

53.54+0.20(+0.38)

Microsoft

30.09-0.12(-0.40)

Home Depot

49.24+0.57(+1.17)

DailyFinance Headlines

DailyFinance BlackBerry App

Benzinga Headlines

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

Page Loaded in 1337178757697 ms.