WoW Insider is getting ready for BlizzCon!

AOL Money & Finance

Why Henry Blodget should go away

More

Peter Cohan, my colleague here at BloggingStocks, recently wrote about Henry Blodget's latest prediction: Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) is going to $2,000! Cohan summed up my reaction nicely: "Is this achievable? Who knows. But one thing's for sure, I am one sucker who took the bait to write about Blodget's call. So while the SEC has banned Blodget from providing investment advice, he remains as media savvy as ever."

After he agreed to a lifetime ban from the securities industry for his role in promoting internet companies (while trashing them in private emails), Blodget has managed to stay in the spotlight. He wrote a terrible book called The Wall Street Self-Defense Manual, which leads me to the thing I dislike most about Blodget. I would love for Mr. Blodget to be a great redemption story but the sad fact is, this man doesn't really seem to take responsibility for what he did. Consider this snippet from his book:

If missing the top had been my only mistake, I would have survived . . . I also made a more serious mistake, however, which was to write a lot of emotional unprofessional e-mails, especially during the heat of the crash. Later, amid the wreckage, when the press, public, and regulators began calling for blood, my emails did me in . . . I was accused by New York State Attorney General Elliot Spitzer of having made remarks in e-mails that were "inconsistent" with my research (popular translation: "privately trashing stocks he was public recommending"). Along with others, I agreed to pay a humongous fine and be barred from the industry. (Bold added by me)

Blodget says he "was accused" of making inconsistent remarks? The use of the passive voice is a terrific tool for shifting the blame but, alas, Blodget did send those emails! MarketWatch's David Weidner also sees through Blodget's bull. In reference to his disclosure that "in 2000, I was among the most-read Wall Street analysts; in 2003, regulators alleged that my bullishness stemmed from conflicts of interest and threw me out of the industry," Weidner writes this: "That's like saying one of the most popular presidents, Richard Nixon, was thrown out of the politics business because prosecutors alleged his sunny outlook was due to his habit of covering things up."

He also adds that The New York Times actually had to strengthen Blodget's original disclosure. I love a good comeback story as much as anyone -- nothing is as heartwarming as a tale of redemption. I admire former white collar criminals Sam Antar and Barry Minkow as much as just about anyone in this industry.

But if Blodget is to recover from his days one of the top Kool-Aid pourers on Wall Street, he should take a look at the 10th step of AA's 12-step treatment program: "...take personal inventory and when wrong, promptly admit it."

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-223.328,280.74
NASDAQ-49.201,796.52
S&P 500-26.91896.42

Last updated: July 04, 2009: 05:57 PM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines