As our site certainly reflects, everything new Google product launch seems to be associated with its ability to "kill" the competition. Putting a "G" in front of anything seems to strike fear in the hearts of investors in competitors, from eBay to Microsoft to AOL. But does Google actually succeed in slaying the knights of Yahoo! with its quiver of wildly-aimed product arrows? An analysis by BusinessWeek suggests, not so much.
Google Talk, for instance, was widely acclaimed as a fearsome challenger to MSN Messenger, AIM, and Yahoo! Messenger. But today, a little less than a year after its launch, the messaging program ranks #10 according to comScore Media Metrix. Social networking site Orkut, hugely popular at launch, is now at less than 1% share in that space (and much though I drooled for an invite, I visited the site once in the past year, although I've frequented many other social networking spots). Google Finance, Google Spreadsheets, and Google blog search have definitely not yet made their home in the "win" column.
The Google new product development process is described by Marissa Mayer as "try a bunch of ideas, refine them, and see what survives." And those that "survive" don't just live, but thrive; Google Maps is now #2 only to Mapquest, and Google News is (in my opinion) the best news search tool available, anywhere.
The big question BusinessWeek asks (and one that no one else is asking right now): does Google even know how to develop a product? The magazine says many of its new services lack "stickiness" and aren't really those that "people want to use." For a company whose product announcements are widely feared and its investors, them's fighting words. Will Google prove to be a conquistador or a schoolyard bully, great at making threats, but quivering inside for fear some competitor might actually stand its ground?
Slow approach to raising bank capital loses the race against write-offs
Cramer on BloggingStocks: The SEC's waffling will be deadly
How Fannie and Freddie will fail
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-01-2006 @ 11:36AM
Gordon Anderson said...
I think Google has a very well thought out and effective strategy. They are operating in much the same way as the recording industry and testing various approaches hoping to get a hit in 1 out of 5 tries. With their Beta Format they can bring on new product quickly and inexpensively. Compare this to Microsoft which keeps extending launch dates and can't seem to do anything right. Also with Google a pattern is starting to emerge where in the future these products can be tied together to achieve an overall multipier effect with the whole being greater than the individual parts.
7-02-2006 @ 7:39PM
Darrin Dassault said...
Everything seems to be moving to the net. All of my business is now done via an online spreadsheet called numsum, You can tweek it do to word processing or I can always send an email using yahoo. The neet part is that for a back up I just print a copy of my latest input.
Numsum is really simple and does not have all of the goodies that some other sheets might have but it is down to earth and will do just about everything.
Unless you are a fancy dan outfit most companies will accept an email text so fancy word processors are not needed.
I have a handheld Data Wind Surfer that is with me 24/7 and I seldom use my laptop.
Great world isn't it.
Darrin Dassault