If any company should be more interested in the fierce net neutrality debate that continues to heat up on Capitol Hill than Google, will it please stand up? I didn't think so -- in fact, Google CEO Eric Schmidt recently published an open letter to Google users on the subject.
After reading what Internet Evangelist Vint Cerf had to say on the subject as well, Google probably has the most to lose should the money-grubbing big telecom firms win in their wishes to control Internet access with tiered services and such. Cerf is widely considered as the "father of the Internet" and is now in the employ of Google. Read Cerf's letter to the U.S. Senate here (PDF).
Should big telecom just give customers big and tall a "data pipe" in which to do anything and everything they need? Well, this is what's been great about Internet access until now -- it's open to everyone and anyone with just a slow or fast data connection. What you do over that connection is nobody's business but your own.
Telecom firms, losing revenue to the innovation of the Internet -- disruptive technologies, if you will -- is going into purely defensive mode (much like the RIAA and MPAA against file-sharing services) in order to protect age-old but stale business models. Instead of innovating to meet consumer needs, telecom lobbyists in Washington are most likely lining pockets to ensure established and anti-competitive telecom firms don't have to change. The customer? Who cares about newer customer technologies, as long as those bills keep getting paid. Eh!
Google's mantra so far has been about innovation and giving the customer what it wants, when it wants and as fast as possible from anywhere with a minimum of fuss. Wow -- what a concept here: Give customers what they want quickly, reliably and efficiently, and they'll come back in droves over and over again.
Hence, Google's business model built on advertising -- of all things -- has worked spectacularly. Big telecom is just not interested in this type of customer innovation, and these firms are just relying on protectionism to ensure the cash cow remains. It's a brave new world, though, and eventually this dated mentality will be bypassed. Net neutrality is just the first test.
GM Kills $10 Million Facebook Ad Campaign Because It Didn't Work
PC Upgrades on Byte-Size Budgets -- Savings Experiment


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-14-2006 @ 8:33PM
Charmelle Guercio said...
I would not pay for Google to search.
I have been with AOL since 1997 & with Cox as cable provider for the past several years. Whether my IP's have used Excite in the past, or Google more recently, or any other search engine, so far I've been pleased with hits thru AOL Search or Yahoo.
6-14-2006 @ 9:54PM
Danielle Clarke said...
If the net (current web companies) as we know them, starts to charge businesses (or individuals) to send emails or do searches i am sure a new company will quickly pop up that will be free to send email and do searches and everyone will leave those existing companies who start charging. This new free service will become the biggest company for sure. Advertisers will flock to the new company and all these companies thinking about charging will falter quickly. So if the present companies are smart they will keep everything as it is.
6-14-2006 @ 10:50PM
Sue Ellen Mobley said...
No, I would not and nether should anyone else. Look how far they have come, being free. I do enjoy "Googleing". The catch phrase of the day in our house..."Just Google it." But I'll be honest, I can narrow my searches better with Jeeves (ask.com) Like just asking, I wonder......? But pay? Not from this kitchen. Don't need it that bad.